<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google HAD to butcher PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oakinnovations.co.uk/blog/2007/11/12/why-google-had-to-butcher-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oakinnovations.co.uk/blog/2007/11/12/why-google-had-to-butcher-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Blogging the web, usability and apple.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.oakinnovations.co.uk/blog/2007/11/12/why-google-had-to-butcher-pagerank/#comment-8011</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oakinnovations.co.uk/blog/2007/11/12/why-google-had-to-butcher-pagerank/#comment-8011</guid>
		<description>An interesting theory, and there could be some thruth to it. It will be interesting to review these events a few months down the line, when we see how everything panned out - assuming things have calmed down again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting theory, and there could be some thruth to it. It will be interesting to review these events a few months down the line, when we see how everything panned out - assuming things have calmed down again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.310 seconds -->
